ABSTRACT
Purpose: To evaluate the surgical efficacy of reinforced plication of the medial rectus muscle to resection as an effective muscle strengthening procedure in exotropia. Methods: This is a prospective randomized trial in patients with exotropia who underwent complete orthoptic evaluation followed by random assignment into two groups by using a computer?drawn random number table. Group 1 patients underwent standard resection with recession procedure, and group 2 patients underwent reinforced plication with recession procedure. Follow?up was performed at day 1, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months to assess the surgical efficacy. Results: A total of 80 patients were included in the study of which 39 were in group 1 and 41 in group 2. The mean age in group 1 was 23.48 ± 11.94 years and 23.29 ± 10.02 years in group 2. The mean preoperative deviation in group 1 for distance was 50.13 ± 11.95 PD and 50.12 ± 9.79 PD in group 2 (P = 0.499). In group 1 with a mean surgical dose of 5.27 mm medial rectus resection and 8.04 mm lateral rectus recession, a 7.11 ± 3.95 PD deviation was noted at the end of 6 months. Similarly, in group 2 with a mean surgical dose of 5.16 mm medial rectus plication and 8.16 mm lateral rectus recession, a 6.00 ± 2.46 PD deviation was noted at the end of 6 months. Between groups, ocular surface changes, inter?surgeon comparison, and exotropia subtypes did not reveal any significant differences. Conclusion: In our observation, the reinforced medial rectus muscle plication showed clinically comparable results as compared to the standard resection procedure at the end of 6 months. Therefore, this innovative modification can be considered as an alternative to standard resection
ABSTRACT
AIM: To compare the effectiveness of unilateral lateral rectus recession-medial rectus resection(RR))and lateral rectus recession-medial rectus plication(RP)in the treatment of exotropia. METHODS: Evidence-based medicine research. A systematic database search was conducted Medline, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and so on from August 2011 to August 2021. Related studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included in our study. The main outcome measures were as follows: success rate and postoperative deviation. Mean difference(MD)and odds ratio(OR)with 95% confidence interval(CI)were statistical analyzed as measurement data and continuous variables statistics. RESULTS: A total of two randomized controlled studies and five retrospective studies were included. The Meta-analysis results showed that the success rate of surgery was similar for RP group compared with RR group(OR=0.65, 95%CI:0.39-1.07, P=0.09). There was no difference in the incidence of poor postoperative prognosis of the two groups(the undercorrection and overcorrection rates)(OR=1.59; 95%CI: 0.92-2.74, P=0.10; OR=4.43; 95%CI: 0.69-28.18, P=0.12). There were no significant differences in postoperative deviation and the amount of external oblique drift(MD=0.75, 95%CI: -0.27-1.76, P=0.15; MD=-0.34, 95%CI: -1.30-0.63, P=0.50). CONCLUSION: The success rate of RP and RR surgery is close to the incidence of poor postoperative prognosis, moreover, there was no significant difference between the deviation and the amount of external oblique drift after the two surgeries, RP is an effective surgical procedure for the treatment of exotropia.